CRS Protection Consultation Challenges to finding solutions to statelessnessDisplay under:
Media corner -> Statements & presentation
Page -> Statements & presentation
CRS Protection Consultation
BALTIMORE, 24 October 2009—ICMC US Liaison Officer, Jane Bloom, addresses the challenges of closing the protection gap for individuals who are especially vulnerable because of a lack of recognised nationality. Though statelessness is a root cause of refugee and migratory movement, it is also both a cause and effect of trafficking. In a nutshell, nationality is the "right to have rights". But access to the exercise of these rights, is blocked. This is a human rights violation in the highest deree. This is the population we can truly call "The Unprotected". Stateless people are spread over some 50 countries and, while the majority continues to live in their country of birth, statelessness is a root cause of refugee and migratory movement. It is also both a cause and effect of trafficking; in fact, the UN has reported that "lack of proof of citizenship is the single greatest risk factor for a girl or woman to be trafficked or otherwise exploited." There are four major challenges that are faced in designing solutions that close the protection gap for this group of people: funding, political will, lack of established mechanisms and protocols, and invisibility. Despite the magnitude, extremely few resources are spent on statelessness by the international community, including by UNHCR, the agency with the stateless protection mandate. Even if we can find the means to work with these people on the ground, though, we are likely to be operation in very hostile territory; our "help" is often not wanted. There is but one durable solution: acquiring nationality. As alternatives, however, we may want to consider also the less-than-permanent, less-than-durable solutions.
To view the complete statement, please see the pdf below.
no News Bite Migrants, Migration and Integral Human Development in the new MDGsAllow me a rather self evident and simple starting point to introduce some of the thinking: if we seek to define sustainable development goals for the post 2015 agenda, there is a need to agree on what is really pursued. It is a simple but challenging starting point, and may well require leaving behind some of the logics of the existing Millenium Development Goals (MDG’s). Development is generally pictured in terms of economic processes and economic growth. Economic growth tends to be explained and monitored through figures and statistics which may indeed allow for comparisons between e.g. Gross National Product levels of different nations and over time. It also introduces the ‘1.5 dollar a day’ poverty definition but we will all agree that this is about monitoring growth with numbers almost alone: a limited and rather materialistic approach which has not proved to be satisfactory to fully measure development and which certainly is not conclusive to properly define ‘poverty’.Read more< |